Recent Articles

Salesforce Adds New CRM Features To Winter '07 Salesforce.com announced new customization features of Winter '07, including full componentization of its analytical dashboards aimed at allowing users to create, share, and combine new components that analyze and present data from Salesforce. Will CEM Ever Challenge its Rich Cousin CRM? Recently Customer Experience Management (CEM) has started to get more profile but it is still just a good idea emerging into an area of marketing thought currently dominated by Customer Relationship Management (CRM). How To Calculate CRM Total Cost Of Ownership Although it may look and sound complicated, calculating the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for on demand CRM is as simple as elementary subtraction. Choosing The Right 'On Demand' CRM Platform Learning the ins and outs of any software package is never an easy task, trying to find the time to learn it all within the limits of a free trial, and then apply it to your specific business needs can prove to be a complete turn off! Do Small Businesses Need CRM? Let's first define what exactly Customer Relationship Management is. The easiest way is to give an example: Every time you get in touch with a customer or prospect (still to be customer), you want to register the information regarding that contact. SugarCRM Releases 4.5 In Beta SugarCRM released the beta version of its customer relationship management (CRM) software Sugar 4.5. The release adds functionalities like personalized views, internationalization and support for Microsoft WindowsServer products.

"We need an instrument of demand that works from the demand side, outside of any of the media's own systems. We need something that works in a free-range way, by and for individuals. Something independent. We need something that expresses the user's or the customer's intentions.
Think about it as Vendor Relationship Management - and the reciprocal of Customer Relationship Management. It's what Drummond Reed calls CoRM, for Company Relationship Management.

It's vigin territory. And you can't get to it from the sell side. You have to approach it from the buy side. From the customer's, or the user's, side of the relationship.

Obviously, this is a development project. In fact, it's the project I'll be working on with the Berkman Center over the next year. I was thinking in that direction during this interview, but we made a lot more progress in just the last few days. I'll be writing more about it this week, mostly in Linux Journal and IT Garage. Naturally, I'll be looking for help."

"What's been broken with so-called 'Customer Relationship Management' systems so far is that, well, they don't really focus that much on the customer, do they? Under the rubric of 'CRM,' there have been three primary classes of systems: sales force automation, customer service and call center automation, and marketing automation. All of these look at the world from the seller's point of view. And all of them focus on how the vendor can crank more customers through a particular process in a given unit of time. They don't necessarily help to truly build relationships between individuals. In fact, they are more likely to commodify it.

There has been a considerable amount of research done in this area, and there in an increasing body of data that suggests that building this kind of 'enterprise social network' has measurable benefit for both customers and vendors alike. Perhaps the cornerstone of recent work in this area was done by Lichtenthal and Tellefsen, and is called 'Toward a Theory of Buyer-Seller Similarity.' L&T write: "These findings suggest that internal similarity [perceptions, attitudes, and values] can increase a business buyer's willingness to trust a salesperson and follow the salesperson's guidance, and therefore, increase the industrial salesperson's effectiveness. In contrast, the literature also indicates that, under most circumstances, observable similarity [physical attributes and behavior] will exert a negligible influence on a business buyer's perceptions or a salesperson's effectiveness. Thus, the key finding is that it is more important for buyers and sellers to 'think alike' than 'look alike'."

To date, there just haven't been tools like this aimed at the enterprise, that take this idea of creating real relationships between individuals and providing a means for customers to explicitly state their case, and determine with whom they want to do business at a real, interpersonal, non-synthetic level. So, we built one."